Financing low income housing in Nigeria

Wood, G; Davis, P; Wapwera, S D; Parsa, A and Egbu, C (2011) Financing low income housing in Nigeria. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 16(3), pp. 283-301. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify and analyse the methods of housing finance adopted by the low income and informal groups in Nigeria. Design/methodology/approach A survey of 300 households in selected areas (low-income/informal) of Jos Metropolis, Nigeria, was carried out, concerning the methods of housing finance used for building and home improvement. Findings The survey showed that 75 per cent of the households utilized traditional methods of financing and 25 per cent using modern methods. Research limitations/implications Based on data collected from the survey, the research serves as a basis for further research into traditional methods of housing finance in developing countries. Practical implications The analysis of traditional financing methods highlights the range and structure of the traditional methods of financing in operation in informal and low income areas of Jos Metropolis, Nigeria. For example, informal and customary/traditional methods (Esusu/Asusu, Age grade association, Men's Revolving Loan Association, Social club contribution among others), of financing appear to be very effective housing finance methods. Social implications The paper shows that In the absence of formal institutional financing methods, strengthening the community-based social network through formalisation and empowerment for housing finance becomes vital. Originality/value It is argued that it is possible to utilise and formalise these traditional methods of housing finance, in order to enhance access to finance for housing development in low-income urban areas in developing countries.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: developing countries; financing; housing; low pay; Nigeria; traditional methods; urban areas
Index terms: developing country, income, housing development, strengthening, urban area, household, survey, community-based, methodology, Nigeria, empowerment, financing, Jos, social network, housing, low income housing
Subjects: research methods, data collection methods, sociology, management, construction type, economic analysis, development economics, demography, structural engineering, housing and residential development, urban form and morphology, communities and social development, Geography
Topics: Human Resources, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, International Construction, Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here