Badu, E; Edwards, D J; Owusu-Manu, D and Brown, D M (2012) Barriers to the implementation of innovative financing (IF) of infrastructure. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 17(3), pp. 253-273. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Failure to resolve Ghana's infrastructure deficit, coupled with inability of traditional financing methods to meet current infrastructure demand, have triggered recent studies to explore strategic issues underpinning innovative financing (IF) of infrastructure. The purpose of this study is to explore potential impediments inherent in IF tools available to Ghana. The empirical aspect of the investigation used structured interviews and a survey questionnaire to gather data from project implementation agencies with experience of infrastructure IF. Factor analysis (principal component analysis) established which variables measured aspects of the same underlying dimensions. A total of three key challenges were identified, and explained in terms of: investment capacity; implementation and revenue mobilization. Findings provide an early failure signal when implementing IF. Conclusions and recommendations are of benefit to various international development partners and governmental and non-governmental organizations that develop and/or implement infrastructure projects. Further research will seek to explore strategic, innovative solutions to on-going challenges. Knowledge of the critical challenges facing implementation of IF remain scant and incomplete.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | barriers; factor analysis; financing; Ghana; implementation; infrastructure project; innovative financing |
| Index terms: | interview, international development, revenue, survey, questionnaire, financing, agency, Ghana, factor analysis, investigation, principal component analysis, innovative financing, non-governmental organization, dimension, infrastructure project, implementation |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, health monitoring assessment and metrics, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, strategic management, sociology, statistical analysis, political science, infrastructure and transport systems, Geography |
| Topics: | Governance, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here