Regression modelling of risk impacts on construction cost flow forecast

Odeyinka, H; Lowe, J and Kaka, A (2012) Regression modelling of risk impacts on construction cost flow forecast. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 17(3), pp. 203-221. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

Significant risk factors inherent in construction cost flow forecast were identified in this study. The aim of this paper is to develop regression models to assess the impacts of the identified risks on the baseline forecast at the in-progress stage of construction. Two stages were involved in data collection. The first was a structured questionnaire survey administered on 370 UK contractors to identify significant risk factors inherent in cost flow forecast. The second stage was the collection of forecast and actual cost flow data from 55 case study projects. Variations between these pair of data sets were measured at 30 per cent, 50 per cent, 70 per cent and 100 per cent completion periods. Respondents were then requested to score on a Likert type scale, the extent of occurrence of the significant risk factors in the case study projects. This pair of data sets were used in regression modelling. Significant risk factors were identified from the questionnaire survey analysis as: changes to initial design, variation to works, production target slippage, delay in agreeing variation/dayworks and delay in settling claims among others. Using the identified significant risk factors and the periodic variability measurements, multiple linear regression models were developed. The models were promising in that they helped to establish the fact that the phenomenon under consideration could be modelled. They also provided some insights in explaining the observed variability between the baseline cost flow forecast and actual cost flow based on risk impacts. The developed models showed a promising level of accuracy but also indicated that the phenomenon under consideration is not strictly linear and may need to explore some other form of modelling. The developed models provide invaluable information to the construction contractors regarding the likely impacts of significant risk variables on cost flow baseline forecast at different stages of construction so that a pro active risk response can be put in place. This study makes an original contribution of providing a modelling insight into the phenomenon of how risks inherent in construction could impact the baseline cost flow forecast at different stages of construction. The information is invaluable in making pro active risk response.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction projects; contractors; cost flow; costs; regression modelling; risk factors; risk management; United Kingdom
Index terms: construction contractor, construction project, variation, questionnaire, United Kingdom, risk response, risk impact, regression modelling, accuracy, survey, actual cost, modelling, variability, risk management, risk factor, construction cost, regression model, case study
Subjects: financial and cost management, analytical methods, risk assessment, data collection methods, practitioner, statistical analysis, environmental hazards, Geography, contractual condition, production management, financial risk, professional development
Topics: Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here