Williams, C C; Nadin, S and Windebank, J (2012) How much for cash? Tackling the cash-in-hand culture in the European property and construction sector. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 17(2), pp. 123-134. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explain the cash-in-hand consumer culture in the property and construction sector. The conventional assumption has been that consumers using cash-in-hand transactions are rational economic actors doing so simply to save money. Here, this is evaluated critically. To do this, evidence from a 2007 Eurobarometer survey involving 26,659 face-to-face interviews in 27 European Union member states is reported. The finding is that saving money is the sole motive of consumers in just 38 per cent of cash-in-hand transactions in the European property and construction sector, one of several rationales in 38 per cent of exchanges and not cited as a rationale in the remaining 24 per cent of cases. Besides, saving money, consumers engage in cash-in-hand transactions to circumvent the shortcomings of formal sector provision in terms of its availability, speed and quality, as well as for social and redistributive rationales. This paper reveals the need for in-depth qualitative research to unravel consumers' complex and heterogeneous rationales for using this sphere. The implication is that changing the cost/benefit ratio confronting consumers when choosing to use the cash-in-hand economy is unlikely to be successful since cost is, in most cases, not their only rationale. Instead, attention needs to be given to improving the availability, speed, reliability and quality of formal sector provision and dealing with cash-in-hand work conducted for social and redistributive purposes. This paper refutes the assumption that goods and services are acquired from the cash-in-hand economy solely in order to save money.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cash; consumer behaviour; European union; informal sector; payments; tax evasion; taxation; underground economy undeclared work |
| Index terms: | consumer behaviour, taxation, European Union, motive, evidence, qualitative research, informal sector, construction sector, interview, survey, face |
| Subjects: | psychology, research design and methodology, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, consumer economics, industry analysis, physical geography and landforms, policy economics |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Regulations & Compliance, Stakeholder Management, Human Resources, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here