Rural infrastructure development in the volta region of Ghana: Barriers and interventions

Badu, E; Owusu-Manu, D G; Edwards, D J; Adesi, M and Lichtenstein, S (2013) Rural infrastructure development in the volta region of Ghana: Barriers and interventions. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 18(2), pp. 142-159. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

Although a high proportion of the Ghanaian population live and work in under-developed areas, research on rural infrastructure development is scarce. The purpose of this paper is to explore the challenges confronting rural infrastructure development and the requisite incentives needed to boost it. An inductive methodological approach was adopted using a structured questionnaire to survey the perceptions of rural contractors. Incentive systems identified include the provision of mobilization funds for projects; a plant pool for rural contractors; special allowance for rates of project items; and provision of letters of credit to secure loans for projects. Key challenges confronting rural construction were identified as a lack of financial institutions willing to support projects with funds; lack of potable water; lack of good health care systems; and lack of a goods market to supply materials. Identification of challenges and incentive systems for rural infrastructure development provides an opportunity to reinvigorate rural infrastructural development in sub-Saharan Africa. The study will be of value to all project partners throughout the supply chain who contemplate rural infrastructure development. The paper presents a novel epitome of rural infrastructure delivery in the developing country of Ghana.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contractors; developing countries; Ghana; infrastructure development; innovations; rural projects; rural regions
Index terms: Ghana, Sub-Saharan Africa, project partner, survey, developing country, questionnaire, infrastructure delivery, infrastructure development, health care, population
Subjects: infrastructure engineering, data collection methods, development economics, strategic project management, public and environmental health, physical geography and landforms, demography, sociology, Geography
Topics: Research Practice, Health and Safety, Project Management, International Construction, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Urban Studies, Geographical Context
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here