Carmichael, D G and Karantonis, J P (2015) Construction contracts with conversion capability: A way forward. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 20(2), pp. 132-146. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the role and viability of changing contract terms as a project progresses and to offer an original analysis in this respect. Commonly, projects start out with broadly defined information, and this gets refined as the project progresses. This suggests that a prudent approach would be to tailor the contract between the project owner and the project contractor to the project stage, with conversions along the way. Information asymmetry between owner and contractor also suggests the need to tailor a contract to a project ' s situation. Design/methodology/approach – An original method of analysis of the conversion of contract terms within projects is given, along with discussion on the risk transfer between owner and contractor, the common law issues associated with implementing such conversions, any compensation that the owner might need to pay, the timing of the conversion and associated practical implementation issues. The paper, for definiteness, concentrates on construction contracts with conversion between payment types, but the paper’s approach applies to all contracts and all terms within contracts. Findings – The paper provides a readily usable method for analysing the value of having a convertible contract, couched within acceptable common law practice. Practical implications – The paper offers a novel method and framework usable by practitioners for establishing the value of convertibility within a contract. Having convertibility within a contract can be shown to offer benefits to both contracting parties. Originality/value – The idea of having flexible contracts is not new, but, hitherto, a rational method of analysing their value has been missing. This paper gives an original analysis of contracts with conversion capabilities. Current literature does not deal directly with the matter addressed in the paper.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | conversion; construction; convertible contracts; option; payment types; switch |
| Index terms: | conversion, convertible contract, contract term, owner, contracting party, construction contract, implementation, compensation, option, information asymmetry, payment type, methodology, practitioner |
| Subjects: | sociology, decision analysis, contractual condition, research methods, manufacturing engineering, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, dispute resolution, practitioner, contract type, transaction economics |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Legal Issues, Procurement, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here