Job stress, job burnout and safety performance in the Palestinian construction industry

Enshassi, A; El-Rayyes, Y and Alkilani, S (2015) Job stress, job burnout and safety performance in the Palestinian construction industry. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 20(2), pp. 170-187. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

Purpose – The purposes of this paper are to identify the most significant job-related stressors that influence construction project professionals' safety, identify the form of stresses and job burnout experienced by construction professionals and investigate the impact of stress and job burnout on safety performance from the perception of construction project professionals in the Gaza Strip construction industry. Construction is characterized as a stressful industry, which influences the safety performance of construction personnel, especially when the stress transfers into burnout. Design/methodology/approach – The views of a variety of construction professionals operating in Gaza Strip were sought using a questionnaire survey. Project managers, project coordinators and site engineers were targeted. Of the 45 questionnaires distributed, 33 were returned. Data were analyzed using the relative importance index (RII), Pearson correlation and regression analysis that used one-way ANOVA test. Findings – Findings revealed that an organizational stressor is the major contributor to physical stress, behavioral stress and job burnout. In addition, the findings showed that construction professionals suffered from emotional stress and invisible burnout. Of significance, the findings revealed that job stresses and job burnout did not affect safety performance in the Gaza Strip construction industry because the first priority for most construction professionals was to maintain permanent employment and, therefore, stresses were often hidden. Research limitations/implications – This study is limited by its small sample size. However, the findings represent novel results, which can be taken into consideration by construction organizations. Practical implications – The findings may help construction organizations in the Gaza Strip to understand job stressors' factors, which affect construction project professionals to help minimize or eliminate their impact on safety performance and, hence, improve productivity in construction projects. Furthermore, the study promotes personnel health and safety and enhancement of the quality of work and construction workers' personal life. The recommendation of this study may also apply to other developing countries. Originality/value – The study contributes to the overall body of knowledge relevant to job stress and burnout in the construction industry of developing countries. It draws attention to the interrelationship between stressors, stresses, burnout and safety performance, and it illustrates a new form of burnout that is invisible burnout.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: performance; professionals; construction; job stress; safety
Index terms: regression analysis, Gaza Strip, construction industry, construction worker, construction professional, job stress, engineer, employment, productivity, sample size, project manager, construction organization, safety performance, body of knowledge, questionnaire, methodology, construction project, survey, relative importance index, construction personnel, health and safety, personnel, burnout, stressors, developing country
Subjects: knowledge management, data collection methods, profession, workforce, risk assessment, research design and methodology, organization, practitioner, occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, statistical analysis, physical geography and landforms, management, research methods, production management, health safety and environment, professional development, development economics
Topics: International Construction, Human Resources, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Information Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here