Understanding delays in housing construction: Evidence from Northern Ireland

McCord, J; McCord, M; Davis, P T; Haran, M and Rodgers, W J (2015) Understanding delays in housing construction: Evidence from Northern Ireland. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 20(3), pp. 286-319. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate delay factors within private housing construction in Northern Ireland. Delays are inherent throughout the construction industry and create major difficulties in terms of project performance and client satisfaction. Whilst a voluminous body of international literature has investigated pertinent delay factors within construction projects, there is a relative paucity of research which offers a more delineated exploration of delay factors affecting private housing development schemes, particularly in the UK context. Design/methodology/approach – This study applies questionnaire survey research to examine the relative importance of 75 delay attribute factors for housing construction projects in Northern Ireland. The approach applies both a relative rank and principal component analysis to distil the key factors impinging upon the delay process in housing construction. Findings – The key finding from this research is that delays within the housing construction sector in Northern Ireland can be attributed to deficiencies in site management, ineffective communication strategies and a lack of coordination between key stakeholders involved in the construction process. Originality/value – The study adds to the existing knowledge base and provides stakeholders with information on factors, which, if properly risk assessed and understood, can improve housing construction performance. The findings are of relevance to construction industry practitioners, policy makers and researchers with lessons learned serving as a basis for future policy development as well as affording an information platform for improving the efficiency and expediency of housing provision internationally.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: delay; housing construction; principal component analysis; relative importance index
Index terms: knowledge base, relative importance, relative importance index, strategy, survey, housing development, exploration, methodology, construction process, construction project, practitioner, questionnaire, evidence, lessons learned, housing provision, efficiency, platform, Northern Ireland, principal component analysis, site management, residential construction, project performance, client satisfaction, construction industry, coordination
Subjects: client relations, construction type, risk assessment, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, environmental resource management, construction operations, performance management, research methods, construction integration, physical geography and landforms, management, project management theory and practice, digital design, professional development, production management, building construction, housing and residential development, statistical analysis, information systems, industry analysis
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here