Coaffee, J; Clarke, J and Davis, P T (2016) A harmonise'd approach to building security-driven urban resilience: A call to arms. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 21(1), pp. 73-80. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose – Resilience is a topical concept in many academic disciplines world-wide and also among practitioners. In Europe, however, the current conceptualisations of urban resilience are highly specific to institutional contexts, national cultures and traditions and emergent risks faced in particular countries and their urban areas. The differences in how urban resilience is understood and applied are important, and yet such differences are only scarcely addressed in current resilience literature. This paper draws from the EU’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration security project HARMONISE – A Holistic Approach to Resilience and Systematic Actions to Make Large Scale Built Infrastructure Secure. Design/methodology/approach – The project develops a comprehensive, multifaceted, yet mutually reinforcing concept for the enhanced security, resilience and sustainability of urban infrastructure and development. As part of the project, 61 experts were interviewed in six European countries (UK, Ireland, Germany, Italy, Spain and Finland) to establish a comprehensive understanding of the current role and position of resilience in urban-built infrastructure. These interviews elicit the current views of professionals from a number of contributory and competing disciplines. Findings – Results indicate that there is no shared holistic understanding of urban resilience in Europe. The definitions of the concept vary across disciplines. The research identifies that there are a number of existing theoretical and practice gaps that require to be addressed. Originality/value – This paper presents a number of research and practice “gaps” which are being addressed in the HARMONISE project and which require to be addressed by the wider academic and practice communities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | holistic approach; sustainable design; urban resilience |
| Index terms: | built infrastructure, Europe, Spain, Finland, holistic approach, national culture, Ireland, sustainable design, interview, urban infrastructure, programme, Germany, practitioner, Italy, urban area, methodology, urban resilience |
| Subjects: | cross-cultural studies, building construction, project controls, infrastructure and transport systems, research methods, urban form and morphology, physical geography and landforms, design process, Geography, sustainability and resilience, business, data collection methods, practitioner |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Urban Studies, Time Control, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here