Maroof, A O; Said, I and Ismail, R (2016) Factors affecting building security cost sustainability using PCA. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 21(1), pp. 21-38. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to evaluate built environment experts' perception of factors affecting the building security cost for sustainable development. It examines the effects of building characteristics and protective measures on the cost of building security within the built environment. Design/methodology/approach – The study uses a quantitative research technique, using questionnaires to source relevant information from respondents. Of the 333 questionnaires administered, 293 usable responses were returned, giving an 88 per cent response rate. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is used to examine the suitability of these data for factor analysis. Principal component analysis (PCA) is used to extract the factors. Findings – Components 1, 2 and 3 reflect concern for procurement of security devices, design process of security requirements and safety of life and property and fear of crime, respectively. The communalities represented by R2 are relatively strong across the variables. Aesthetics is significant with an R2 value of 0.71, which shows that this factor should be given due consideration when procuring building security devices. Also, height, location and use of building are significant with R2 values of 0.70, 0.63 and 0.71, respectively. These factors positively influence the building security cost and should be given due consideration when designing protective buildings. Practical implications – The findings would assist in the evaluation, planning and control of the rising cost of building security. Social implications – This study serves to sensitize built environment experts, criminologists and policymakers of the design implication of protective requirements of building security. Originality/value – This study provides empirical evidence that the various factors considered have an effect on the building security cost and contribute immensely towards sustainable the building security cost within the built environment.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | built environment; principal component analysis; crime prevention; building security cost; burglary; sustainability assessment |
| Index terms: | quantitative research, burglary, aesthetic, built environment, factor analysis, principal component analysis, crime prevention, design process, sustainability assessment, exploratory factor analysis, building security cost, sustainable development, evidence, questionnaire, methodology, suitability |
| Subjects: | health safety and environment, factor and component analysis, sustainability assessment, research methods, infrastructure and transport systems, design criteria, statistical analysis, design methods, criminal law, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Legal Issues, Design Practice, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here