Pantzartzis, E; Price, A D F and Pascale, F (2016) A built environment response to the rising costs of dementia. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 21(2), pp. 160-187. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose This paper aims to identify costs related to dementia care provision and explore how purpose-built environment investments can help control these costs and improve quality of life and clinical outcomes. Design/methodology/approach This research adopts a multi-method approach where the findings of a literature review drove the analysis of data obtained from the 115 pilot projects funded by the Department of Health England’s National Dementia Capital Investment Programme. Findings Under the UK Government’s new productivity challenge, it is fundamental to identify actions that provide value for money to prioritise policy and practice. This paper identifies healthcare spaces (e.g. bathroom) where the impact of the built environment on healthcare costs are most evident and building elements (e.g. lighting) to which these costs can be directly associated. The paper advocates the development of evidence and decision support tools capable of: linking built environment interventions to the healthcare costs; and helping the healthcare and social care sectors to develop effective and efficient capital investment strategies. Research Limitations/implications Further work needs to develop more systematic ways of rationalising proactive and timely built environment interventions capable of mitigating dementia (and older people) care cost escalation. Originality/value This research takes an innovative view on capital investment for care environments and suggests that appropriate built environment interventions can have a profound impact on costs associated with dementia care provision.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | costs; social care; healthcare; quality of life; built environment; dementia; care provision; dementia-friendly; value for money |
| Index terms: | dementia, decision support, capital investment, strategy, quality of life, literature review, programme, methodology, older people, evidence, social care, cost escalation, value-for-money, England, productivity, care provision, dementia-friendly, built environment |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, demography, project controls, health conditions and diseases, sociology, decision analysis, Geography, evaluation, management, public and environmental health, research methods, economics, data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, sustainability and resilience, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Time Control, Urban Studies, Value Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here