Griffiths, R; Lord, W and Coggins, J (2017) Project bank accounts: The second wave of security of payment? Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 22(3), pp. 322-338. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study is to identify building contractors' views as to the need for, impact of and barriers to the use of project bank accounts (PBAs) in the UK construction industry. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional research study was carried out by the use of questionnaires to collect quantitative data. The population for the research was of construction professionals working as full-time employees for either main (Tier 1) or specialist contractors (Tiers 2-4). Findings Contractors consider PBAs as an effective initiative to encourage fair payment. There is uncertainty, however, as to whether PBAs will result in project cost savings. Head contractor resistance is perceived to be the biggest barrier to the use of PBAs. Adoption of PBAs in private-sector construction projects is likely to be slow. Research limitations/implications The relative infancy of PBA usage in the construction industry means that responses are largely based on awareness as opposed to experience. Nevertheless, survey data represent a snapshot of contractors' perceptions with respect to PBAs, which may be used as a benchmark against which to compare future studies to monitor how contractors' views and expectations have changed with time. Originality/value The survey results will be of particular interest to those international jurisdictions who are considering, or who have already embarked on, the path of trialling and/or using PBAs in the public sector.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | security of payment; construction insolvency; late payment; payment trusts; project bank accounts |
| Index terms: | project cost, jurisdiction, survey, construction insolvency, questionnaire, project bank accounts, specialist contractor, construction project, population, methodology, payment trust, building contractor, public sector, savings, construction professional, future study, construction industry, security of payment, late payment |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, legal systems, practitioner, research design and methodology, risk assessment, data collection methods, industry analysis, administrative law, payment, demography, professional development, production management, warranties, economics, research methods |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Urban Studies, Contract Administration, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here