Infrastructure financing and economic growth in India: An empirical investigation

Chotia, V and Rao, N V M (2018) Infrastructure financing and economic growth in India: An empirical investigation. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 23(3), pp. 258-273. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to suggest the preferred mode of financing for major sub-sectors of infrastructure: roads, seaports, telecommunication and energy by examining which mode of infrastructure financing – public, private or public–private partnership (PPP) – has the maximum positive impact on the overall GDP of India. The same exercise was carried out for the overall infrastructure sector by integrating data from all the four sub-sectors. Design/methodology/approach: The structural vector autoregressive approach was used with the period of analysis taken from 1995 to 2014. The stationary properties of the variables were checked by the Phillips–Perron unit root. Findings: The PPP mode of financing was found to make the maximum positive impact on the GDP of India. Considering the four sub-sectors individually, it was concluded that the private mode of financing in roads, energy and telecom sectors has the maximum positive impact on the GDP, while the PPP gives optimal benefit to the seaports sector. Practical implications: Results will aid the Indian Government and policymakers to efficiently design and develop their economic policies accordingly. Originality/value: The study is novel in a sense that it helps to address the lack of research into the area of infrastructure financing in India.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: economic growth
Index terms: partnership, exercise, economic growth, India, investigation, infrastructure financing, economic policy, financing, infrastructure sector, telecommunication, methodology
Subjects: economic analysis, business policy, communication, health behaviours and lifestyles, data collection methods, industry analysis, partnership management, Geography, financial risk, economic development, research methods
Topics: Governance, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here