De Silva, N; Weerasinghe, N; Madhusanka, H W N and Kumaraswamy, M (2018) Enablers of relational integrated value networks (RIVANS) for total facilities management (TFM). Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 23(2), pp. 170-184. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify enablers for setting up relationally integrated value networks (RIVANS) for total facilities management (TFM) as a holistic approach to bridge the Project Management (PM) phase to the facilities management (FM) phase, aiming for better service delivery while optimizing the life-cycle cost. These enablers are proposed as required driving forces for the industry to bridge current gaps through RIVANS for TFM so as to improve the value of the facility and deliver better value to its stakeholders over its life span. Design/methodology/approach: A literature review elicited 11 typical better values that could be achieved by suitably linking the PM and FM supply chains in general. While these were tested in parallel research exercises in Hong Kong, the UK and Singapore, this paper reports on the specific findings from Sri Lanka, where a Web-based questionnaire survey was conducted to identify potential better values for proposed relational networks (including the clients, consultants, contractors and suppliers in the supply chain). Better values were then clustered under principal domains/components using factor analysis to establish synergetic enablers. Findings: In total, 11 significant better values for TFM were identified and four enablers were extracted as building long-term integrated networks, establishing a common resource pool linking PM and FM, enhancing sustainability of TFM and developing a similar protocol between PM and FM. Originality/value: The study carried out in this paper contributes to knowledge by identifying drivers to bridge the gap between PM and FM to best achieve clients' long-term aspirations through a holistic life-cycle approach. Furthermore, all stakeholders in TFM can revisit their practices to establish and strengthen the identified enablers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | better values; facilities management; project management; relationally integrated value networks |
| Index terms: | project management, Sri Lanka, holistic approach, factor analysis, exercise, service delivery, Singapore, Hong Kong, facilities management, questionnaire, methodology, survey, value network, literature review, total facilities management |
| Subjects: | service delivery, Geography, project management theory and practice, management, research methods, statistical analysis, health behaviours and lifestyles, value management, data collection methods, business, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here