Conflict prevention measures for public-private partnerships in developing countries

Osei-Kyei, R; Chan, A P C; Yao, Y and Mazher, K M (2019) Conflict prevention measures for public-private partnerships in developing countries. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 24(1), pp. 39-57. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

Purpose: Conflict between project parties is among the major risk factors in public–private partnership (PPP) in developing countries that has, in extreme cases, led to the failure or distress of many PPP projects. This paper aims to explore conflict prevention measures for PPPs in developing countries using Ghana as a case study. Design/methodology/approach: From a comprehensive review of literature, a list of conflict prevention measures was derived; further, a questionnaire survey was conducted with PPP experts from Ghana. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance test, range normalization method and factor analysis were used for data analysis. Findings: Results show four significant conflict prevention measures for PPPs in developing countries, they include extensive stakeholder consultation in decision makings, clear goals and mutual benefit objectives, clarity of roles and responsibilities of parties and transparent appeal procedures. Using the factor analysis technique, the prevention measures are grouped into three unrelated categories, they are efficient communication structure and risk assessments, transparency and openness and proficient service delivery. Originality/value: The research findings inform policymakers and local practitioners of the strategic measures and procedures needed to minimize the occurrence of conflicts in PPPs in developing countries.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: conflict prevention; developing countries; factor analysis; Ghana; public-private partnership
Index terms: survey, project party, developing country, data analysis, decision-making, methodology, practitioner, questionnaire, partnership, Ghana, distress, case study, service delivery, prevention, transparency, risk assessment, risk factor, factor analysis
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, practitioner, data collection methods, statistical analysis, environmental hazards, decision analysis, sociology, partnership management, financial risk, professional development, development economics, service delivery, Geography, research methods, structural engineering
Topics: Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Cost Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here