Radvan, M (2019) Municipal charges on communal waste: Do they compete with the immovable property tax? Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 24(2), pp. 148-165. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to give a recommendation to the municipalities what local tax/taxes sensu largo (a waste charge or an immovable property tax increased by a local coefficient) are to be collected to achieve expected and necessary incomes and limit the administrative costs. Design/methodology/approach: To reach the aim, it was necessary to analyze the number of municipalities increasing the property tax by the local coefficient and abolishing the charge on communal waste to save money for the waste charges administration. The evidence of municipalities applying the local coefficient was used as a basis for the research. To get the information on charges on communal waste collected in these municipalities with the local coefficient within the past at least five taxable periods, the information from Monitor was used. If there was any such a significant change, then it was necessary to use the bylaws and to do thorough analysis of the reasons. Findings: The hypothesis that a high number of municipalities in the Czech Republic are replacing the charge on communal waste with the local coefficient applicable for the immovable property tax was rejected. In the opinion of the author, the ideal approach is to have just one local tax – immovable property tax. This tax is administered by the state tax office and the revenue should cover the cost of waste management. Adopting only the property tax increased by the local coefficient, it is necessary to explain the benefits to the taxpayers, that is, locals and voters. Originality/value: The research on the given topic was never done in the Czech Republic, as there is no evidence of local charges collected in individual municipalities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | communal waste charge; local tax; property tax; tax administration; tax revenue; waste management |
| Index terms: | income, Czech Republic, revenue, evidence, waste management, methodology, municipality |
| Subjects: | Geography, research methods, administrative law, waste management, evaluation and assessment methods, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here