Santoso, D S and Bourpanus, N (2019) Moving to e-bidding: Examining the changes in the bidding process and the bid mark-up decisions of Thai contractors. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 24(1), pp. 2-18. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to examine the influences of shifting the bidding system of Thai public infrastructure projects from e-auction to e-bidding. Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire survey was conducted with owners or senior managers with direct responsibility in deciding the mark-up of 72 small and medium-sized contractor firms. Five senior professionals were interviewed to provide insights into and to strengthen the discussion of the findings. The Wilcoxon test was applied to analyze the difference in the importance of the factors between e-auction and e-bidding. Findings: The results revealed a shift in the importance of the factors, from those related to the financial aspects in the e-auction to the situational aspects in the e-bidding. The comparison test results also suggested that the majority of factors become significantly less important in the e-bidding system, with “identity of competitors” and “general expense of the bidding process” having the most apparent mean differences. The interview results supported by data on winning prices and estimations strongly indicated that bid collusions likely exist in the e-auction. By shifting to e-bidding, the data also show that the Thai Government can save public money in its infrastructure project development. Originality/value: The study provides an analysis from the perspectives of contractor firms on how e-auction and e-bidding options influence bid mark-up decisions. Many studies have focused on the issues and advantages provided by the e-procurement mainly from the owner (government)'s perspective but how the change influences the contractor’s attitude has been less explored.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bidding; contractors; public construction project; tendering and procurement; transparency in public procurement |
| Index terms: | identity, public construction, transparency, option, infrastructure project, public infrastructure, contractor firm, estimation, owner, questionnaire, e-bidding, methodology, bidding, mark-up, interview, manager, survey, collusion |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, bidding, organization, data collection methods, practitioner, decision analysis, sociology, building construction, price determination, information systems, infrastructure and transport systems, tendering, research methods, professional development |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Procurement, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here