Ayodele, T O and Olaleye, A (2021) Flexibility decision pathways in the management of uncertainty in property development: Experience from an emerging market. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 26(3), pp. 408-432. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to investigate the flexible decision pathways adopted by development advisors in the management of uncertainty in property development. Specifically, the study examines the quantitative techniques adopted by development advisors, the level of adoption of real options analysis (ROA) vis-à-vis the level of adoption of heuristics. Finally, the types of options exercised in property development were analysed. This was with a view to providing information that could mitigate the challenges of risk and uncertainty and increasing investment failure associated with property development in Nigeria, an emerging market. Design/methodology/approach: The study adopted a survey method and was conducted on development advisors in property development companies/estate surveying and valuation firms in Nigeria. A total of 195 development advisors participated in the survey. The respondents were required to rate, on a five-point Likert scale, the level of adoption of the quantitative models, heuristics and the types of flexibility exercised during development. The data were analysed using mean rating, one-sample t-test and analysis of variance. Findings: The results revealed that there was a preference for the use of traditional techniques, while probabilistic appraisal models and other contemporary methods such as ROA are seldom adopted by development advisors. While there was a significantly high level of adoption of heuristics, the stratified analysis examining the profile of the respondents and the level of adoption of ROA and heuristics suggests that years of experience influenced the level of adoption of both the ROA and heuristics by the development advisors. The analysis of the types of flexibility showed that staging/phasing and changing the initial use/design were the most prevalent flexibility pathways adopted during the development. However, the study found that there was no significant difference concerning the choice of flexibility being adopted by development advisors who used ROA and those who did not. Practical implications: The study provides an understanding of the decision pathways adopted by development advisors in an emerging market like Nigeria. Originality/value: The paper contributes to studies on decision-making pathways in the management of uncertainty under dynamic conditions by development advisors in emerging markets.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | development advisors; flexibility; heuristics; option analysis; property development; real estate development; risks |
| Index terms: | preference, appraisal, Likert scale, methodology, decision-making, real estate development, survey, surveying, emerging market, option, real options analysis, property development, Nigeria, heuristic, variance |
| Subjects: | measurement and scaling, decision analysis, Geography, decision-making and reasoning, research methods, economic development, factor and component analysis, economic analysis, health monitoring assessment and metrics, design economy, data collection methods, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Risk Management, Design Practice, Urban Studies, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here