Ginigaddara, B; Perera, S; Feng, Y and Rahnamayiezekavat, P (2022) An evaluation of offsite construction skill profiles. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 27(1), pp. 16-28. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to evaluate the existing and emerging Offsite Construction (OSC) skills. Construction industry is inherently labour oriented, fashioning poor labour productivity, low sustainability, slow and costly processes. These shortcomings promote OSC alongside driving forces such as industrialisation, automation and digitalisation. However, the traditional construction skills are not on par with the complexity, where robots, co-bots and digital-driven automated systems create the need for novel OSC skills. Design/methodology/approach: Data collection is executed through a Roundtable activity hosting Construction Management academics form Australian universities specialising in construction technology. They engaged in ranking of skills along with creating a word cloud for the question, “what are the future construction skills that will be more beneficial in an OSC platform?” Word cloud is reviewed in a discussion approach while skills ranking data is analysed using descriptive statistics. Findings: The most prominent OSC skills are logistics manager, project manager and digital producer. Attributes of skills that come under construction trades workers, design, engineering and specialist professionals will vary based on onsite-offsite percentage combination in a construction project. Study reviews the required construction skills at two ends of a continuum featuring the trade-based skills; bricklayer, concreter and carpenter at one end (traditional build) and the heavily digitalised and automated skills at the other end (OSC). The noticeable transition towards OSC urges industry practitioners, policy-makers and education providers to focus on understanding and cultivating key OSC skills. Originality/value: This study describes the transition of skills from onsite to OSC. It is presented as one of the earliest attempts to evaluate OSC skill profiles.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; industrialisation; learning skills; offsite manufacturing; skill profiles |
| Index terms: | labour productivity, construction technology, automation, statistics, construction industry, platform, traditional construction, project manager, onsite, carpenter, practitioner, construction project, methodology, complexity, digitalization, manager, bricklayer, industrialization |
| Subjects: | digital design, automation and robotics, production management, research methods, management, economic development, systems engineering, heritage and conservation, industry analysis, building construction, practitioner, mathematical modelling, digital engineering, profession, digital technology |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here