Abdullah, S; Abdul Wahab, M R; Abdul Razak, A and Hanafi, M H (2023) Property taxation: The encouraging factors for payment among the taxpayers. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 28(1), pp. 22-44. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was identifying factors that encourage property tax payment among property owners, specifically from the residential property segment within the Malaysian context. This aim is derived from existing evidence which clearly indicates a steady annual increase in property tax arrears from non-complying property owners as reported by the local governments (LGs). Design/methodology/approach: This research was conducted using a survey method where a questionnaire was used as the research instrument in garnering the necessary study data. The collected data was analyzed through quantitative means towards gleaning study findings to fulfil the set objectives. The analyses used within this study were reliability analysis, descriptive analysis and factor analysis. Findings: Research findings indicate that there are five factors that encourage property tax payment, namely, the proactive action capability of LGs; stimulation of payment; quality of staff and service; reliable tax foundation and governance; and smart expenditure. The identification of these factors has the potential to act as a mitigation mechanism for LGs to alleviate the issue of property tax arrears. Research limitations/implications: The findings of this study may be used by LGs in developing a comprehensive action plan to encourage property owners to pay taxes. The study findings are exploratory in nature, based on the locality of the LG selected in this study, the Penang Island City Council (MBPP). As such, the findings may not be considered as a generalization of the property tax situation throughout Malaysia as study data was only collected from the administrative region of MBPP. However, these findings can still be used as a basis in establishing similar studies within other LGs which demonstrate similar characteristics with MBPP. Originality/value: In the Malaysian scenario, the focus of the previous studies on property tax arrears revolves around actions that have been taken by LGs to encourage the payment of property tax. However, in this study, the determination of encouraging factors is no longer referred to LG perspectives but was investigated from the taxpayer dimension. This approach allows new mitigating ideas to be developed and adds value in the context of a different perspective towards establishing a more practicable action plan in reducing property tax arrears.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | encouraging factors; property tax; tax arrears; taxpayers |
| Index terms: | survey, local government, mitigation, questionnaire, evidence, property owner, methodology, Penang, residential property, reliability analysis, governance, Malaysia, taxation, dimension, factor analysis |
| Subjects: | business, construction type, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, reliability engineering, health monitoring assessment and metrics, research methods, financial risk, policy economics, Geography, sociology, statistical analysis, administrative law |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Governance, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Regulations & Compliance |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here