Saka, N and Arowoiya, V (2023) An assessment of the linkages between the construction and other sectors of the Nigerian economy. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 28(3), pp. 351-373. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose: The construction sector (CNS) occupies a very unique position in any economy depending on whether developed or developing economy. The size and linkages of the CNS are expected to be high to help push or pull the economy from developing to developed economy through elaborate forward and backward linkages, a cardinal aim of developing economies. This paper aims to investigate the forward and backward linkages of the CNS in the Nigerian economy. Design/methodology/approach: In contrast to the traditional input–output analysis to assess sectoral economic performance and production interdependence, this paper used econometric techniques, including unit root test, cointegration test and Granger causality test to analyze the data. Time-series data (TSD) for the study were extracted from United Nations Statistical Department database. Findings: The result indicated that the CNS has low forward linkages but high backward linkages to virtually all the sectors of the Nigerian economy. Thus, the outputs of construction mainly satisfy the manufacturing and other activities. Originality/value: The paper gives an insight into the construction on backward linkages but less extensive forward linkages. The paper recommends a massive local content development of sector to deepen backward and forward linkages and thus helps pull or push weak sectors out of stagnation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction sector; econometric techniques; linkages; Nigerian economy |
| Index terms: | interdependence, econometric, forward linkage, database, United Nations, linkage, backward linkage, construction sector, methodology, developing economy, cointegration, Granger causality test |
| Subjects: | business, institutional frameworks, organizational purchasing, economic analysis, research methods, economic development, factor and component analysis, organizational analysis, data management, economic theory, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Procurement, Governance, International Construction, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here