Yang, W; Firouzi, A and Li, C Q (2023) Risk transfer in project finance loans for toll road using credit default swaps. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 28(1), pp. 1-21. ISSN 1366-4387
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the applicability of the Credit Default Swaps (CDS), as a financial instrument, for transferring of risk in project finance loans. Also, an equation has been derived for pricing of CDS spreads. Design/methodology/approach: The debt service cover ratio (DSCR) is modeled as a Brownian Motion (BM) with a power-law model fitted to the mean and half-variance of the existing data set of DSCRs. The survival probability of DSCR is calculated during the operational phase of the project finance deal, using a closed-form analytical method, and the results are verified by Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). Findings: It is found that using the power-law model yields higher CDS premiums. This in turn confirms the necessity of conducting rigorous statistical analysis in fitting the best performing model as uninformed reliance on constant time-invariant drift and diffusion model can erroneously result in smaller CDS spreads. A sensitivity analysis also shows that the results are very sensitive to the recovery rate and cost of debt values. Originality/value: Insufficiency of free cash flow is a major risk in the toll road project finance and hence there is a need to develop innovative financial instruments for risk management. In this paper, a novel valuation method of CDS is proposed assuming that DSCR follows the BM stochastic process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | project finance; project management; public–private–partnership; risk analysis; transportation |
| Index terms: | survival, road project, project management, risk management, statistical analysis, Monte Carlo simulation, partnership, pricing, recovery, variance, project finance, valuation method, risk analysis, methodology, toll, default, sensitivity analysis, cash flow |
| Subjects: | infrastructure engineering, project management theory and practice, research methods, financial management, environmental hazards, transportation engineering, measurement and scaling, partnership management, dispute resolution, risk assessment, economic analysis, environmental science, data science, real estate economics, modelling and simulation, operations management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Urban Studies, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here