The potential of new models of construction procurement to counter cost overruns in construction projects: An exploratory study from a contractors' perspective

Sheamar, S; Wedawatta, G; Tennakoon, M; Palliyaguru, R and Antwi-Afari, M F (2024) The potential of new models of construction procurement to counter cost overruns in construction projects: An exploratory study from a contractors' perspective. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 29(2), pp. 211-228. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

Purpose: Cost overrun is a significant issue in construction, an undesirable feature the industry has long been associated with. Poor procurement practices are often blamed for subsequent cost overruns in construction, especially with conventional procurement methods leading to outrageous cost overruns. The purpose of this study is to review the features of the new models of construction procurement (NMCP) and assess their potential to reduce cost overruns in construction projects. Design/methodology/approach: A literature review was conducted to identify the issues of procurement leading to cost escalations. Primary data were obtained through exploratory, semi-structured interviews using a case study approach. Findings: Clients' lack of knowledge was highlighted as a key issue in procurement that interlinks with many factors causing cost escalation. The findings suggest that the features contained within the NMCP, such as early contractor involvement and collaboration throughout the project team, have the potential to make a positive contribution to addressing cost escalation in construction. Research limitations/implications: The primary research was undertaken as an exploratory study and presents the contractor's perspective. Further research is therefore suggested, with multiple organisations representing all key stakeholders in a construction project, including clients, consultants, sub-contractors and suppliers. Practical implications: The study recommends awareness of the NMCP be raised throughout the industry, and simplified information must be made available to help widen uptake of these contemporary procurement methods. Originality/value: Addressing the dearth of research concerning the use of NMCP within the industry, this study makes a niche contribution to the body of knowledge on construction cost management by illustrating the potential offered by these new procurement methods for addressing cost escalation. For an industry where collaboration is accepted with reservations, this case study demonstrates how novel collaborative strategies such as open book costing, project bank accounts and shared pain and gain mechanisms can be implemented as part of the procurement strategy and how such strategies can contribute towards minimising the cost escalation inherent in construction projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: collaboration; construction cost escalation; cost overrun; cost-led procurement; integrated project insurance; procurement; two stage open book model
Index terms: procurement strategy, construction cost, cost overrun, case study, pain, procurement method, project team, costing, construction procurement, insurance, exploratory study, early contractor involvement, literature review, strategy, interview, body of knowledge, cost escalation, project bank accounts, sub-contractor, methodology, collaboration, construction project
Subjects: contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, project delivery, financial and cost management, economic analysis, practitioner, data collection methods, payment, health conditions and diseases, production management, management, research methods, accounting and finance, economics
Topics: Organizational Design, Contract Administration, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here