Office property price index forecasting using neural networks

Xu, X and Zhang, Y (2024) Office property price index forecasting using neural networks. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 29(1), pp. 52-82. ISSN 1366-4387

Abstract

Purpose: The Chinese housing market has witnessed rapid growth during the past decade and the significance of housing price forecasting has undoubtedly elevated, becoming an important issue to investors and policymakers. This study aims to examine neural networks (NNs) for office property price index forecasting from 10 major Chinese cities for July 2005–April 2021. Design/methodology/approach: The authors aim at building simple and accurate NNs to contribute to pure technical forecasts of the Chinese office property market. To facilitate the analysis, the authors explore different model settings over algorithms, delays, hidden neurons and data-spitting ratios. Findings: The authors reach a simple NN with three delays and three hidden neurons, which leads to stable performance of about 1.45% average relative root mean square error across the 10 cities for the training, validation and testing phases. Originality/value: The results could be used on a standalone basis or combined with fundamental forecasts to form perspectives of office property price trends and conduct policy analysis.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: forecasting; neural network; office property price
Index terms: neural network, mean square error, housing, methodology, validation, policy analysis, investor, office property, becoming, forecasting, testing
Subjects: construction type, policy studies, professional practice, artificial intelligence, prediction and forecasting, professional development, probability and distributions, research methods, philosophical process, sociology
Topics: Digital Applications, Construction Technology, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here