Foliente, G and Seo, S (2012) Modelling building stock energy use and carbon emission scenarios. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 1(2), pp. 118-138. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
A systematic approach is needed to engage a broad range of stakeholders to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from energy use in the building sector. The purpose of this paper is to develop a systems-based bottom-up approach for this purpose, and to demonstrate its application in a case study of office building stock in the State of New South Wales (NSW) in Australia. A conceptual framework for the general method is developed based on a cross-typology matrix of energy consumption and supply on the one hand, and intervention schemes or policy instruments on the other. This is then tested and demonstrated using a case study of commercial office building stock, with building energy demand calculated using a validated computer energy simulation tool for a representative set of office buildings within a local government area (LGA). The energy consumption and associated GHG emissions are then aggregated up from LGA to the whole State. The impact projections of different intervention schemes are compared and mapped spatially across the State. Results have demonstrated the significance and capability of the proposed approach, in allowing quantitative comparisons of the relative effectiveness of a specific set of regulatory, technical and behavioral scenario settings on the spatial distribution and trends in energy consumption and GHG emissions of the NSW office building stock to 2020. Further case studies involving mixed building types and specific building types with greater granularity of modelling details, energy use and supply options, and spatial resolution are needed. The structured cross-typology approach is a novel contribution to bottom-up modelling approaches to designing and/or assessing the effectiveness of specific policy instruments, alone or in combination. It will enable policy makers, property portfolio owners, utility companies and building tenants to assess the broader impacts of their specific actions towards a common goal.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; bottom-up; buildings; carbon dioxide; efficiency; greenhouse gas; spatial analysis |
| Index terms: | efficiency, energy demand, case study, spatial distribution, carbon emission, owner, Australia, office building, energy consumption, effectiveness, energy use, modelling, bottom-up approach, option, local government, energy simulation, carbon dioxide, tenant, spatial resolution, building stock, commercial office, New South Wales, conceptual framework, greenhouse gas, policy instrument |
| Subjects: | theoretical framing, performance management, Geography, asset management, decision analysis, measurement and scaling, sociology, administrative law, construction type, data collection methods, policy studies, practitioner, climate science, urban planning, modelling and simulation, energy systems, geographical analysis, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Governance, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here