Glass, J (2012) The state of sustainability reporting in the construction sector. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 1(1), pp. 87-104. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose – As a mechanism to make a company's strategies, actions and achievements more transparent, sustainability reporting (SR) enables companies to communicate performance, develop a reputation for responsible behaviour and gain competitive advantage, yet it remains largely voluntary. A scant evidence base suggests that the construction sector lags behind other industries on SR; the purpose of this paper is to clarify the current status and define a research framework for future development of SR in construction. Design/methodology/approach – This paper examines standards for disclosure, scope and content vehicles for disclosure, transparency and assurance, voluntary vs mandatory reporting, and integrated reporting, through a review of literature, reports and standards. Findings – SR can drive change, offer competitive advantage and reputational capital, but this is contested ground, academically. A critical examination of SR in construction contributes to the debate by identifying challenges around data durability, stakeholder engagement, reputation management and the nature of the sector. A novel framework, research questions and recommendations are presented. Research limitations/implications – This study is based on literature, standards and guidance documents, so has not yet been subject to scrutiny via empirical research; recommendations for such are, however, outlined clearly within the paper. Originality/value – Construction companies have to balance commercial drivers with demands for high-profile sustainable buildings and enhanced corporate sustainability; this is a generally under-researched area. This is the first paper to argue that SR offers a new lens on corporate sustainability in construction and considerable scope for novel research.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | communication; corporate reporting; disclosure; responsibility; sustainability |
| Index terms: | construction sector, sustainable building, sustainability reporting, methodology, documents, evidence, strategy, construction company, transparency, stakeholder engagement, durability, competitive advantage |
| Subjects: | sustainable construction, professional development, management, research methods, industry analysis, market analysis, environmental impact, community and social dimensions, evaluation and assessment methods, organization, material degradation and durability |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here