Atef Elhamy Kamel, M (2013) Encouraging walkability in GCC cities: Smart urban solutions. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 2(3), pp. 288-310. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
It is noted that cities in the region of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) have a very poor Walkability Index. It is typically the forgotten mode of transport. Moreover, walking has become impossible. This is not just due to the scorching weather conditions but also due to the excessive dependence of the residents on the private automobile. The purpose of this paper is to explore walkability urban problems and to propose smart urban solutions so as to encourage walking in GCC cities. This present paper defines walkability and portrays its advantages and benefits. It adapts the criteria of walkability to meet GCC cities planning needs. Furthermore, it analyzes Masdar City in Abu Dhabi as an example of encouraging walkability using smart solutions. The pilot case study for this present paper, King Abdullah national park in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, will be the application pool of those criteria. However, a questionnaire has been formulated in order to solicit some facts about attaining pedestrian comfort in that park. The paper provides various smart urban solutions so as to encourage walkability in GCC cities. Through presenting an overview of walkability in GCC cities and suggesting smart urban solutions, an additional study would be required to encourage walkability in other environments using various intelligent urban features.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Gulf Cooperation Council; intelligent; smart; sustainability; urban open space; walkability |
| Index terms: | walkability, case study, Saudi Arabia, comfort, open space, weather, Gulf cooperation council, pedestrian, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | institutional frameworks, data collection methods, air quality, occupational health and safety management, sociology, Geography, urban design |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Governance, Urban Studies |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here