Ding, G (2013) Demolish or refurbish: environmental benefits of housing conservation. Construction Economics and Building, 13(2), pp. 18-34. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Climate change and energy efficiency are some of the most pressing issues facing China today. With its economic growth since 1978, the government has struggled to contain environmental damages and social unrest related to the economy's rapid transformation. With the rapid growth in population and urbanization the demand for housing has escalated and traditional housing has been under threat of demolition to make way for new construction. Traditional housing is generally considered wasteful in its use of land and/or energy, and is often demolished for more intensive and more energy-efficient housing, despite the resulting loss of embodied energy and urban amenity. A research project was undertaken to study the environmental performance of traditional housing in Hangzhou. The project looks into analyzing and comparing embodied energy and CO2 for seven dwellings. In addition indoor climate data were recorded and collected in the form of hourly temperature and humidity readings for one year in six local houses and in a modern unit as a control for one year. The research results reveal that there is little difference in environmental performance between traditional and conventional modern construction and the value of conservation rather than demolition as a strategic development for the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | CO2 emission; embodied energy; historic buildings; indoor climate |
| Index terms: | urbanization, energy efficiency, indoor climate, environmental performance, population, historic building, construction industry, China, humidity, land, economic growth, conservation, transformation, damages, climate change, embodied energy, housing |
| Subjects: | construction type, sustainability assessment, economic development, business, Geography, dispute resolution, climate science, urban planning, environmental policy, demography, sustainability and energy, real estate economics, environmental science, energy systems, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Governance, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here