Sanchez X, A; Lehtiranta, L; Hampson, K D and Kenley, R (2014) Evaluation framework for green procurement in road construction. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 3(2), pp. 153-169. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose – Most barriers and enablers of sustainable projects are related to procurement. The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework for evaluating green procurement practices throughout the lifecycle of road construction projects and demonstrates its application through an Australian case study. Design/methodology/approach – The study is based on linking the phases of road construction with incentive mechanisms for proactively motivating behavioural change. A holistic view on utilised and potential incentives is attempted with a literature review and a state-of-practice review. The latter is based on interviews and 90 policy and procurement documents across five Australian states. Findings – An evaluation framework with seven procurement stages is suggested to describe current state green procurement incentives throughout the delivery lifecycle of road construction projects. The Australian case study was found to provide useful data to identify gaps and strong points of the different states regarding their level of integration of sustainability and greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) reduction elements in their procurement practices. This understanding was used to draw recommendations on future advancement of green procurement. Originality/value – Government entities across the globe can impact considerably the achievement of sustainability and GHG targets, by using their procurement practices and requirements to create incentives for contractors and suppliers to engage in more GHG conscious practices. The present study provides a systematic account of how green procurement practices can be underpinned using the Australian road construction industry as a case study, and distinguish between strong and weak links in the green procurement chain to draw recommendations for future initiatives.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; sustainability; case study; infrastructure; procurement; road construction |
| Index terms: | green procurement, lifecycle, road construction, Australia, behavioural change, case study, greenhouse gas emission, methodology, integration, documents, literature review, interview, evaluation |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, project delivery, civil engineering, research methods, Geography, professional development, organizational analysis, environmental health, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Sustainability, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here