Wågø, S and Berker, T (2014) Architecture as a strategy for reduced energy consumption? An in-depth analysis of residential practices' influence on the energy performance of passive houses. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 3(3), pp. 192-206. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss how architectural solutions may influence residential practice and energy consumption. Design/methodology/approach – The paper is part of a larger study based on qualitative investigations of six energy-efficient housing projects in Norway. Here, the authors examine one of these projects, Løvåshagen in Bergen, the first Norwegian passive house flat building. Based on a combination of 14 interviews with household members and energy consumption data for all flats, the authors show how residential practices influence energy consumption. In the discussion and conclusion, the authors focus on the role of the architecture in these practices. Findings – On the one hand, Løvåshagen reflects a mainstreaming approach to sustainable building, attracting a wide array of different occupants. On the other hand, the specific add-ons that are intended to make the buildings energy efficient require new definitions of comfort and new skills to achieve the promised energy savings. This combination can explain why Løvåshagen, after four years of occupation, has a large variation in actual energy consumption. Practical implications – In designing new energy-efficient housing, greater attention should be paid to the level of end-user control and adaptability, the level of system complexity, and the need for adequate information. An alternative to the mainstreaming approach would be to actively use architecture to influence residential practices towards reduced energy consumption. Originality/value – The use of qualitative methods to analyse quantitative energy data is original and provides promising opportunities to understand the significance of residential practices regarding actual energy consumption.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | new technologies; architecture as facilitator; energy consumption; energy efficiency; passive house standard; residential practice |
| Index terms: | facilitator, energy efficiency, new technology, energy performance, energy consumption, household, energy-saving, passive house, investigation, comfort, mainstreaming, strategy, occupation, housing project, qualitative method, Norway, interview, housing, complexity, passive house standard, methodology, variation, sustainable building, residential practice, adaptability |
| Subjects: | sustainability and energy, economic analysis, innovation and technology management, energy systems, business, research design and methodology, user focus, data collection methods, construction type, practitioner, sociology, demography, housing and residential development, occupational health and safety management, systems engineering, research methods, design practice, management, sustainable construction, Geography, contractual condition, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Urban Studies, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here