Sustainable human capacity development in the African built environment: How far is the journey to a knowledge society?

Ene, G U; Goulding, J S and John, G A (2016) Sustainable human capacity development in the African built environment: How far is the journey to a knowledge society? Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 5(3), pp. 212-231. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose A growing recognition that human capital is a more critical factor than physical capital in wealth creation has led to the drive for individuals, organisations, industries and societies to become knowledge producing entities. Africa’s growing population, high rate of urbanisation and demand for sustainable infrastructure development have highlighted the need for human capacity development (HCD). However, studies indicate that the supply systems for learning which African construction organisations rely on are weak and immature generating wide spread reports of skills shortages, skills mismatches, skill deficiencies and concomitant high unemployment. This paper forms the prologue in a wider research aimed at developing a workforce capability optimising model for construction firms and the purpose of this paper is to review literature relating to HCD to highlight needs and to explore the applicability of emerging workforce development (WD) approaches in project-based construction workplaces. Design/methodology/approach Literature review, limited to peer reviewed academic publications in English from 2000 to 2016. Findings Much of the literature reviewed focus on educational aspects and consequently basic entry skills into the construction workforce. Workplace learning (WL), though acknowledged, is not given much attention. However, life-long learning, WL and self-directed learning have taken on greater significance because of the transient nature of knowledge in the Knowledge Age. WD practices of construction firms in Africa range from non-existent to average particularly at intermediate skills levels. Originality/value The paper makes a case for improved WD systems applicable to the African construction workplace and introduces elements of a proposed capability optimising framework that supports sustained effective learning environments and learners. Significantly, the model will incorporate HCD for intermediate skills and learning at the project level of the organisation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Africa; workforce development; learning; workplace learning; construction industry; human capacity development
Index terms: Africa, human capital, urbanization, construction organization, critical factor, human capacity development, built environment, mismatch, construction industry, society, infrastructure development, construction firm, literature review, workforce development, population, methodology, workplace learning, publication, shortages, unemployment
Subjects: research dissemination and communication, risk assessment, engineering problems, organization, urban planning, data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, regions and continents, management, research methods, economics, professional development, infrastructure engineering, demography, communities and social development, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Human Resources, Urban Studies, Education, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Governance, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here