Biophilic urbanism: The potential to transform

Kellert, S (2016) Biophilic urbanism: The potential to transform. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 5(1), pp. 4-8. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose – The emergent and allied concepts of biophilia, biophilic design, and biophilic urbanism are all concerned with human experiences of nature. This spans the theoretical affiliation with, and the need for nature (biophilia) that can be achieved through design approaches in the built environment (biophilic design), and systemically throughout cities (biophilic urbanism). The purpose of this paper is to distinguish attributes and principles of each and addresses their application in contemporary urban settings. Design/methodology/approach – This commentary draws on extant literature in the fields of biophilia, biophilic design, and biophilic urbanism to consider these concepts within broader discourse around nature and design. The author provides clarity on how this direct understanding and practice of urban design and development provides for meaningful experiences with nature. Findings – The unifying focus of this discussion is the evolutionary proposition that humans developed an innate tendency to affiliate with the non-human environment that continues to be instrumental in people’s physical and mental health, fitness and wellbeing. The application of biophilic design and urbanism will require a deeper appreciation of how contact with nature continues to function as the basis for a healthy, productive, and successful modern city, beyond practical considerations for integrating natural features into urban environments to foster meaningful experiences. Originality/value – There is a burgeoning array of terms and approaches relating to urban nature, with limited consideration for the unique contribution each makes to practice. This commentary highlights philosophical and practical implications of the allied concepts of biophilia, biophilic design, and biophilic urbanism to guide practitioners in the built environment.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: biophilic urbanism; biophilic; biophilic design; urban nature; nature by design
Index terms: built environment, nature by design, biophilic, mental health, biophilia, urban nature, urbanism, methodology, well-being, practitioner, urban environment, urban design
Subjects: infrastructure and transport systems, health conditions and diseases, urban design, cities and urban places, design practice, research methods, design incorporating nature, human factors and perception, urban sustainability, practitioner, mental health and wellbeing
Topics: Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Design Practice, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here