Brynskov, M; Heijnen, A; Balestrini, M and Raetzsch, C (2018) Experimentation at scale: Challenges for making urban informatics work. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 7(1), pp. 150-163. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to discuss how experimentation with open Internet of Things data can be institutionalised in an inclusive manner at scale. Design/methodology/approach: The approach is conceptual, addressing key challenges discussed in the literature on experimental cities. This exposition of the problem of scaling experimentation is anchored in findings from two projects (Dampbusters and OrganiCity), which seek to implement experimentation as a practice of sustainable digital urban development. Findings: One central finding is that local interventions need transferable frameworks and mechanisms to achieve scaling effects of experimentation as a practice. In addition, experimentation must embed common engagement principles, structures of data and interfaces, and governance principles across use cases to be scaled. Originality/value: The authors outline how and why experimentation can be a useful approach to address challenges of implementing urban informatics into concrete uses and procedures for co-creation. Based on reports from two projects, the authors develop recommendations for experimentation at scale that reflect the need for engagement principles, the need for common data structures and interfaces, as well as governance principles.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | experimentation; governance; internet of things; scale; smart cities; urban informatics |
| Index terms: | governance, smart city, urban development, scaling, internet, co-creation, experiment, informatic, methodology, data structure |
| Subjects: | urban sustainability, computing systems, business, organization, data collection methods, data science, urban design, design process, research methods, information science |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Governance, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here