Foth, M (2018) Participatory urban informatics: Towards citizen-ability. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 7(1), pp. 4-19. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to trace how the relationship between city governments and citizens has developed over time with the introduction of urban informatics and smart city technology. Design/methodology/approach: The argument presented in the paper is backed up by a critical review approach based on a transdisciplinary assessment of social, spatial and technical research domains. Findings: Smart cities using urban informatics can be categorised into four classes of maturity or development phases depending on the qualities of their relationship with their citizenry. The paper discusses the evolution of this maturity scale from people as residents, consumers, participants, to co-creators. Originality/value: The paper’s contribution has practical implications for cities wanting to take advantage of urban informatics and smart city technology. First, recognising that technology is a means to an end requires cities to avoid technocratic solutions and employ participatory methodologies of urban informatics. Second, the most challenging part of unpacking city complexities is not about urban data but about a cultural shift in policy and governance style towards collaborative citymaking. The paper suggests reframing the design notion of usability towards “citizen-ability”.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | citizen co-creation; collaborative citymaking; interaction design; participation; smart cities; urban informatics |
| Index terms: | smart city, governance, co-creation, interaction, usability, informatic, complexity, methodology, evolution |
| Subjects: | user-centered design, business, urban sustainability, environmental science, research methods, design process, systems engineering, behavioral psychology, information science |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Governance, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here