Beyond green façades: Active air-cooling vertical gardens

Davis, M M; Vallejo Espinosa, A L and Ramirez, F R (2019) Beyond green façades: Active air-cooling vertical gardens. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8(3), pp. 243-252. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: Vertical gardens offer multiple benefits in urban environments, including passive cooling services. Previous research explored the use of “active vertical gardens” as potential evaporative air-cooling units by developing a mathematical model based on the FAO-56 Penman Monteith equation. Further research showed that active vertical gardens function best by creating an airflow in the cavity behind the garden such that air is cooled by flowing over the water-saturated garden substrate. The purpose of this paper is to improve the quantification of active vertical garden performance. Design/methodology/approach: A building-incorporated vertical garden was built in Quito, Ecuador, with an air inlet at the top of the garden, an air cavity behind the garden and where air was expelled from the base. Measurements were made of air temperature, humidity and velocity at the air inlet and outlet. Findings: The active vertical garden cooled the air by an average of 8.1 °C with an average cooling capacity of 682.8 W. Including the effects of pre-cooling at the garden inlet, the garden cooled the air by an average of 14.3 °C with an average cooling capacity of 1,203.2 W. Originality/value: The results are promising and support the potential for active vertical gardens to be incorporated into building services and climate control.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: air-conditioning; building façades; evaporative cooling; green wall; sustainable energy
Index terms: evaporative cooling, air temperature, humidity, sustainable energy, climate control, building service, quantification, methodology, urban environment, Ecuador, mathematical model
Subjects: research methods, Geography, measurement and scaling, thermal systems, environmental engineering, mathematical modelling, climate science, urban sustainability, engineering systems, renewable energy
Topics: Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here