Praharaj, S and Han, H (2019) Building a typology of the 100 smart cities in India. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8(5), pp. 400-414. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: The Smart Cities Mission (SCM) in India is generating significant interest among researchers and policymakers globally. Cities under the SCM, irrespective of their locations, size, capacities or local needs, are heavily investing in technological solutions to improve civic conditions. The purpose of this paper is to build a typology and urban classification system of these 100 smart cities using a series of key performance indicators (KPIs) around urban development and access to public services. The paper also systematically recognises the diversity of challenges facing these cities and assess whether a generic technology-based approach is adequate to address them. Design/methodology/approach: A two-stage statistical process is employed in this typology building exercise – first, a cluster analysis is conducted to classify the selected cities, then a multiple discriminant analysis is used to characterise each classified city. Findings: The urban typology analysis finds that vast disparities remain across India’s urban centres, located in different geographical regions, in terms of access to social capital and physical infrastructure. The KPIs around education, health and social services emerged from the analysis as the most significant drivers in the urban typology building process. The lack of basic community infrastructure, especially in the small-to-medium-sized cities in India, exposes the shortcomings of a one-size-fits-all technocratic smart city development strategy that assumes foundational infrastructure is already in place for technology to take effect. Originality/value: The research methodologies developed in this paper offers a novel planning approach for smart city policymakers to devise place-based smart city interventions, acknowledging diverse cultures and specific community needs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cluster analysis; smart city; urban typology |
| Index terms: | cluster analysis, methodology, building process, physical infrastructure, smart cities mission, social capital, strategy, research methodology, urban development, India, disparity, exercise, key performance indicator, discriminant analysis, public services, smart city |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, administrative law, statistical analysis, sociology, social justice, building construction, Geography, urban design, management, research methods, data analysis and analytics, project delivery, specific urban areas and projects, health behaviours and lifestyles, urban sustainability, research design and methodology |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Site Management, Urban Studies, Legal Issues, Ethics |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here