The social imperative in sustainable urban development: The case of Masdar City in the United Arab Emirates

Randeree, K and Ahmed, N (2019) The social imperative in sustainable urban development: The case of Masdar City in the United Arab Emirates. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 8(2), pp. 138-149. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine social sustainability effectiveness of eco-cities through the case of Masdar City’s strategy for urban sustainability in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Design/methodology/approach: Using a case study approach, the paper is an exploratory, qualitative analysis, which investigates the social, environmental and economic performance of Masdar City, a purported carbon-neutral, zero-waste urban development. Findings: Though Masdar City substantively contributes to innovation in sustainable urban development within environmental and economic contexts and has been effective in capital circulation in green technology markets, the impetus as a commercially driven enterprise is most evident. Successful sustainable urban development requires greater consideration for the social imperative. Practical implications: Eco-city mega-projects, such as Masdar City, have the potential to fuse achievements in innovation, technology and economic enterprise with the social imperative of functional urban habitats. Originality/value: Eco-

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Abu Dhabi; eco-city; Masdar City; sustainability; United Arab Emirates; urban development
Index terms: social sustainability, effectiveness, urban development, markets, case study, sustainable urban development, methodology, qualitative analysis, United Arab Emirates, urban habitat, circulation, strategy
Subjects: sustainability and resilience, economic analysis, data collection methods, research design and methodology, urban sustainability, communities and social development, management, performance management, research methods, Geography, urban design
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here