du Toit, J and Wagner, C (2020) The effect of housing type on householders' self-reported participation in recycling. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(4), pp. 395-412. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article is to examine the effect of housing type, relative to demographics, on householders' self-reported recycling across low-, medium- and high-density housing without recycling facilities by using the theory of planned behaviour. Design/methodology/approach: A survey was conducted amongst 580 households across houses, townhouses and apartments in Pretoria, South Africa. The household member most responsible for recycling completed a self-administered questionnaire. Data were analysed using factor and reliability analyses, decision trees and multivariate analysis of variance. Findings: Age was the strongest predictor; the older the respondent, the more likely the household recycled. Housing type was the second strongest predictor with a significant increase in recycling in houses compared to townhouses and apartments. Subsequent analyses focussed on young respondents to control for age. Housing type had an overall non-significant effect on the factors behind recycling. Post hoc tests, however, suggest that young respondents in townhouses and apartments felt significantly less able to recycle, particularly because of lack of space and support from managing agencies. Practical implications: For recycling to be acceptable to young people in medium- and high-density housing, interior architects and site planners should find innovative ways to make individual and communal facilities as convenient and accessible as possible to tenants, owners and recycling companies. The role of managing agencies is also critical. Originality/value: This study is one of the first to systematically examine recycling across three different housing types with recommendations for planning, design and further research.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | household recycling; housing; interior architecture; multivariate analysis of variance; site planning; theory of planned behaviour |
| Index terms: | housing, agency, South Africa, questionnaire, methodology, survey, tenant, multivariate analysis, recycle, planned behaviour, demographics, architect, decision tree, planner, household, owner, recycling, reliability analysis, variance, density |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, construction type, profession, data collection methods, waste management, practitioner, reliability engineering, demography, decision analysis, measurement and scaling, sociology, statistical analysis, behavioral psychology, research methods, Geography |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here