Managing risk in green building projects: Toward a dedicated framework

Javed, N; Thaheem, M J; Bakhtawar, B; Nasir, A R; Khan, K I A and Gabriel, H F (2020) Managing risk in green building projects: Toward a dedicated framework. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(2), pp. 156-173. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: The formal application of project risk management (PRM) in green building projects is still an emergent part of project management. The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual PRM framework that increases the probability of success in green building projects by minimizing unexpected events. Design/methodology/approach: This paper interprets the related literature and uses the opinion of green building experts. It exposes some pertinent elements needed for structuring the PRM framework and suggests some mitigation actions for high-ranked risks. It also performs ex-post analysis on a case study to practically validate the proposed framework. Findings: It is found that high initial cost, lack of experienced contractors and subcontractors, consideration of lifecycle inflation and experience in green building project management are the most significant risks. To address them, the framework proposes a rigorous selection of contractors, provision of financial incentives from the government, setting of a time buffer to accommodate legal process and development of a deliberate proactive financial model. Originality/value: This paper contributes to the body of knowledge and practice by providing a reasonable strategy for employing the PRM framework capable of effectively managing risk in green building projects to keep organizations competitive within the business environment. The overall aim of this study is to contribute to the further development of the area of risk assessment and risk management from a knowledge-based perspective.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: case study; framework; green buildings; green risk; project risk management; risk assessment
Index terms: project management, risk assessment, risk management, lifecycle, project risk management, case study, body of knowledge, subcontractor, inflation, methodology, green building, mitigation, strategy, financial incentive, time buffer
Subjects: operations research, project delivery, economic analysis, knowledge management, data collection methods, risk assessment, practitioner, research methods, design practice, management, financial risk, project management theory and practice
Topics: Design Practice, Time Control, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here