Moshtaghian, F; Golabchi, M and Noorzai, E (2020) A framework to dynamic identification of project risks. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(4), pp. 375-393. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: Merging and updating project information and recording changes can give dynamic risk identification at all stages of the project. The main purpose of this research is to create an integration in construction information. Design/methodology/approach: In this research, the 5D model was prepared and then all model information was entered into the database designed in SQL Server, the project report tables were coded, and finally, a database with four groups of information was ready for risk identification. Findings: Creating an integrated risk identification platform reduced rework and time and cost control and change management, which were positive effects of risk identification at the right time. Research limitations/implications: In order to identify risks, creating multilateral databases whose information integration enables timely completion of the project and compliance with the planning. Practical implications: This research is the basis for identifying project risks within the framework of building information modeling and can be an effective contribution to increasing the risk-taking efficiency of the project. Originality/value: As a matter of fact, marked time and cost are terrific motivating forces for the building industry, materializing with identify risk well-time. In any case, identifying risk engaged with all of the dimensions depend on this industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; database; dynamic; project risk; risk identification; work breakdown structure |
| Index terms: | database, platform, information integration, building information modelling, efficiency, dimension, building industry, risk identification, rework, change management, risk taking, compliance, cost control, integration, methodology |
| Subjects: | data management, organizational analysis, industry analysis, information systems, management, performance management, research methods, decision-making and reasoning, health safety and environment, financial risk, digital design, operations management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here