A BIM-based construction claim management model for early identification and visualization of claims

Parchami Jalal, M; Yavari Roushan, T; Noorzai, E and Alizadeh, M (2020) A BIM-based construction claim management model for early identification and visualization of claims. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 10(2), pp. 227-257. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims at introducing a claim management model based on building information modeling (BIM) for claims that can be visualized in BIM models. Design/methodology/approach: Based on the results of a questionnaire survey, 10 claims were identified as claims that can be visualized in BIM models (named hard claims in this study). Then, a BIM-based claim management model was developed and used in a case study. Findings: A BIM-based claim management model is represented. The claim management process through this model consists of four steps: (1) extracting project information, identifying conditions prone to claim and storing them into a relational database, (2) automatically connecting the database to building information model, (3) simulation of the claims in building information model and (4) final calculations and report. Practical implications: The proposed model can provide benefits to parties involved in a claim, such as early identification of potential claims, large space for data storage, facilitated claim management processes, information consistency and improved collaboration. Originality/value: There are a few studies on providing solutions to claim management based on BIM process. Hence, the original contribution of this paper is the attempt to set a link between BIM and claim management processes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architecture; building information modeling; claim management; engineering; hard claims; multi-dimensional simulation; visualization
Index terms: multi-dimensional simulation, data storage, relational database, survey, collaboration, methodology, questionnaire, hard claim, construction claim, visualization, building information modelling, case study, database, claim management
Subjects: modelling and simulation, data collection methods, liability law, information systems, payment, data management, contractual condition, research methods, design practice, management
Topics: Legal Issues, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here