Towards sustainable cities: About redundancy, voids and the potentials of the land

Roggema, R (2020) Towards sustainable cities: About redundancy, voids and the potentials of the land. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(3), pp. 283-306. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: With future (extreme) change ahead of us, there are many serious problems humankind has to face. The pace of mitigating climate change through an energy transition to renewables is slow, global mean temperature is increasing and sea level seems to rise at an accelerated pace. This puts many livelihoods at risk and communities have to face an uncertain future. Therefore, continuing the way contemporary cities are developing and developed is not an option. The new normal should also be reflected in urbanism. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, the answer to this question is sought in understanding traditional attitudes to living and their relation to the land. How these cultures have been capable of coping with disruptions lies in the way their mental paradigm respects their environment. A more resilient future can be achieved when the traditional values of the relation of societies with the land they live on are considered important and indigenous knowledge and perspectives are used to design cities. Findings: Current society seems to have forgotten what it means and how to put into practice sharing resources and space, giving back more to the environment than used to live. Also, mankind seems to be lacking the ability to move and search for the potentials where to live. Furthermore, choosing to live in safe places, hence being less vulnerable for disruptions, is a principle that has long been neglected. These characteristics of traditional cultures are translated in four principles that are valuable in design processes: first, making use of the energy and power a disaster might bring and turning it into an advantage; second, using imagination to anticipate an unknown future; third, accommodating all paces of urban change; and fourth, designing redundancy for flexibility. The use of these principles is illustrated in three Sydney-based examples. Originality/value: The link between indigenous knowledge and current urban design practice is new.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: disaster; disruption; spatial redundancy; uncertainty; urban design; urban voids
Index terms: methodology, climate change, society, urban design, design process, face, redundancy, paradigm, coping, land, option, sustainable city, urbanism
Subjects: design methods, climate science, real estate economics, psychology, research methods, cities and urban places, education and knowledge transfer, management, urban design, decision analysis, behavioral psychology, communities and social development
Topics: Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Human Resources, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here