Smits, M W M (2020) Toward self-reliant development: Capacity gap within the built environment of Mt. Elgon rural inhabitants. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 9(3), pp. 321-339. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to present an extensive household survey amongst four rural communities on Mt. Elgon Kenya. The area is the chosen area for the author’s overall PhD research. In order to offer the inhabitants of Mt. Elgon suitable housing support, the purpose of this paper is to assess the gap between existing housing capacities and compare those to desired housing capacities. Design/methodology/approach: The research combined a survey method with an interview setting. The survey helps the interviewer to structure and register given answers. The interview allows the inhabitant to ask questions or make suggestions. Findings: The research finds that the two communities with financial restraints are unable to articulate improved housing (within their existing capacities) without external help. For the two communities with less financial restraints, the research finds that they struggle to maintain, extend or replicate housing solutions without external help. Originality/value: The size (200 households), type (purpose, design and approach) and locality of the research are uncommon frameworks to understand inhabitants' needs toward their built environment. The value, therefore, not only lies in the design of the evaluation framework, but also in the findings that indicate that this is a successful way to conduct this type of research in a vulnerable context. Hopefully providing other researchers in the built environment with an applicable framework.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | household survey; self-reliance; sub-Sahara Africa |
| Index terms: | evaluation, interview, survey, capacity gap, methodology, housing, Kenya, Africa, built environment, household |
| Subjects: | management, research methods, Geography, demography, infrastructure and transport systems, construction type, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, regions and continents |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Construction Technology, Urban Studies, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here