Automated activity and progress analysis based on non-monotonic reasoning of construction operations

Karsten Winther, J; Nielsen, R; Schultz, C and Teizer, J (2021) Automated activity and progress analysis based on non-monotonic reasoning of construction operations. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 10(3), pp. 457-486. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Real-time location sensing (RTLS) systems offer a significant potential to advance the management of construction processes by potentially providing real-time access to the locations of workers and equipment. Many location-sensing technologies tend to perform poorly for indoor work environments and generate large data sets that are somewhat difficult to process in a meaningful way. Unfortunately, little is still known regarding the practical benefits of converting raw worker tracking data into meaningful information about construction project progress, effectively impeding widespread adoption in construction. The presented framework is designed to automate as many steps as possible, aiming to avoid manual procedures that significantly increase the time between progress estimation updates. The authors apply simple location tracking sensor data that does not require personal handling, to ensure continuous data acquisition. They use a generic and non-site-specific knowledge base (KB) created through domain expert interviews. The sensor data and KB are analyzed in an abductive reasoning framework implemented in Answer Set Programming (extended to support spatial and temporal reasoning), a logic programming paradigm developed within the artificial intelligence domain. This work demonstrates how abductive reasoning can be applied to automatically generate rich and qualitative information about activities that have been carried out on a construction site. These activities are subsequently used for reasoning about the progress of the construction project. Our framework delivers an upper bound on project progress (“optimistic estimates”) within a practical amount of time, in the order of seconds. The target user group is construction management by providing project planning decision support. The KB developed for this early-stage research does not encapsulate an exhaustive body of domain expert knowledge. Instead, it consists of excerpts of activities in the analyzed construction site. The KB is developed to be non-site-specific, but it is not validated as the performed experiments were carried out on one single construction site. The presented work enables automated processing of simple location tracking sensor data, which provides construction management with detailed insight into construction site progress without performing labor-intensive procedures common nowadays. While automated progress estimation and activity recognition in construction have been studied for some time, the authors approach it differently. Instead of expensive equipment, manually acquired, information-rich sensor data, the authors apply simple data, domain knowledge and a logical reasoning system for which the results are promising.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: abductive reasoning; constraint programming; building information modeling; real-time location sensing; personal protective equipment; artificial intelligence; radio frequency identification; unmanned aerial vehicles; automation; construction sites; lean manufacturing
Index terms: user group, construction site, experiment, knowledge base, interview, reasoning, sensor data, decision support, logic programming, abductive reasoning, project planning, construction project, upper bound, construction process, programming, lean manufacturing, estimation, construction operation, real-time location sensing, activity recognition, building information modelling, radio frequency identification, automation, estimate, artificial intelligence, data acquisition, unmanned aerial vehicle, constraint programming, paradigm, personal protective equipment, work environment
Subjects: cognitive psychology, building construction, decision analysis, occupational health and safety management, information systems, algorithms, management, manufacturing engineering, education and knowledge transfer, probability and distributions, production management, automation and robotics, computer vision, work location, research products and data, modelling and simulation, digital technology, financial and cost management, artificial intelligence, construction operations, client relations, research design and methodology, data collection methods, control systems, programming
Topics: Design Practice, Digital Applications, Site Management, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Health and Safety, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here