Machine learning using synthetic images for detecting dust emissions on construction sites

Xiong, R and Tang, P (2021) Machine learning using synthetic images for detecting dust emissions on construction sites. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 10(3), pp. 487-503. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Automated dust monitoring in workplaces helps provide timely alerts to over-exposed workers and effective mitigation measures for proactive dust control. However, the cluttered nature of construction sites poses a practical challenge to obtain enough high-quality images in the real world. The study aims to establish a framework that overcomes the challenges of lacking sufficient imagery data (“data-hungry problem”) for training computer vision algorithms to monitor construction dust. This study develops a synthetic image generation method that incorporates virtual environments of construction dust for producing training samples. Three state-of-the-art object detection algorithms, including Faster-RCNN, you only look once (YOLO) and single shot detection (SSD), are trained using solely synthetic images. Finally, this research provides a comparative analysis of object detection algorithms for real-world dust monitoring regarding the accuracy and computational efficiency. This study creates a construction dust emission (CDE) dataset consisting of 3,860 synthetic dust images as the training dataset and 1,015 real-world images as the testing dataset. The YOLO-v3 model achieves the best performance with a 0.93 F1 score and 31.44 fps among all three object detection models. The experimental results indicate that training dust detection algorithms with only synthetic images can achieve acceptable performance on real-world images This study provides insights into two questions: (1) how synthetic images could help train dust detection models to overcome data-hungry problems and (2) how well state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms can detect nonrigid construction dust.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction dust emissions; object detection; deep learning; virtual rendering engine; internet of things; machine learning; computer vision; dust control; demolition; construction sites; health risks; United Kingdom
Index terms: state of the art, mitigation, dataset, machine learning, object detection, virtual rendering engine, dust control, health risk, computer vision, virtual environment, construction site, United Kingdom, construction dust emission, accuracy, comparative analysis, monitoring, internet, testing, efficiency, deep learning, synthetic image
Subjects: environmental engineering, environmental health, data management, financial risk, professional development, Geography, computer vision, performance management, data analysis and analytics, professional practice, artificial intelligence, visualization, work location, computing systems, control systems, environmental impact, virtual reality, research dissemination and communication, computational design
Topics: Sustainability, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Cost Management, Site Management, Quality Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here