Modelling the yield of 8.64 kw PV panels installed on a rooftop of a building in the Kingdom of Bahrain

Alnaser, N W and Alnaser, W E (2022) Modelling the yield of 8.64 kw PV panels installed on a rooftop of a building in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 11(1), pp. 162-174. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: This paper allows more accurate estimation of the economy in investing in PV electrification for buildings, especially for Gulf Cooperation Council Countries (GCCC) where they have nearly similar climate and building structure. The actual solar electricity yield from this building is used to make empirical modelling. Design/methodology/approach: The accurate automated daily-recorded solar electricity from 8.64 kW solar PV on a rooftop of Sadeem Building at Awali, Bahrain, was modelled to polynomial equations of order of 6. The effect of the tilt (β) and azimuth (Ψ) angle of PV panels for smart and sustainable buildings is studied. Findings: The correlation of each set of polynomial equation (R2) is listed and had reached a highest value of 0.9792 (for order of 6) with lowest value of 0.1853 (for order of 1). The model may be also applied to the GCCC. The results show that each kW of PV will have a solar electricity yield, on average, of 4.1 kWh. It also shows that the tilt angle has little influence on the solar electricity yield (less than 10%) when the tilt angle changed from 26° to 0° or from 26° to 50°. The influence of the azimuth angle is found to be more than 50% in changing Ψ from 90° to 180°. Research limitations/implications: The model may not be restricted to Bahrain but applies – to a certain extent – to GCCC (six countries) and to other countries having buildings with similar roof design and at latitude close to the latitude of Bahrain. Practical implications: The model enables developers and investors to estimate, with high accuracy, the solar electricity provided from a building if PV panels are to be installed on its rooftop (or facade) at different tilt (β) and azimuth (Ψ) angle for smart and sustainable buildings. Social implications: Empirically finding out how much each kW of solar PV integrated to the building will produce solar energy electricity (in kWh), that is, 1 kW of PV yield, on average, 4.1 kWh. Originality/value: Establishing empirical models to evaluate the outcome of each installed kW of PV panels. Each 1 kW installation of PV panels is 4.0 kWh/day, on average. This is less than what commercial companies claim for this region, that is, 1 kW produces 5.5 kWh/ day – which affects the estimated economic outcome of PV projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: azimuth angle; modelling; pv installation; sustainable buildings; tilt angle
Index terms: Gulf cooperation council, sustainable building, methodology, accuracy, solar energy, modelling, estimate, roof, tilt angle, Bahrain, estimation, latitude, investor
Subjects: sociology, geographical data, geometry and topology, research methods, design practice, sustainable construction, professional development, Geography, institutional frameworks, financial and cost management, analytical methods, energy systems
Topics: Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability, Governance, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here