Personal thermal comfort models: A deep learning approach for predicting older people's thermal preference

Arakawa Martins, L; Soebarto, V; Williamson, T and Pisaniello, D (2022) Personal thermal comfort models: A deep learning approach for predicting older people's thermal preference. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 11(2), pp. 245-270. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: This paper presents the development of personal thermal comfort models for older adults and assesses the models' performance compared to aggregate approaches. This is necessary as individual thermal preferences can vary widely between older adults, and the use of aggregate thermal comfort models can result in thermal dissatisfaction for a significant number of older occupants. Personalised thermal comfort models hold the promise of a more targeted and accurate approach. Design/methodology/approach: Twenty-eight personal comfort models have been developed, using deep learning and environmental and personal parameters. The data were collected through a nine-month monitoring study of people aged 65 and over in South Australia, who lived independently. Modelling comprised dataset balancing and normalisation, followed by model tuning to test and select the best hyperparameters' sets. Finally, models were evaluated with an unseen dataset. Accuracy, Cohen’s Kappa Coefficient and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) were used to measure models' performance. Findings: On average, the individualised models present an accuracy of 74%, a Cohen’s Kappa Coefficient of 0.61 and an AUC of 0.83, representing a significant improvement in predictive performance when compared to similar studies and the “Converted” Predicted Mean Vote (PMVc) model. Originality/value: While current literature on personal comfort models have focussed solely on younger adults and offices, this study explored a methodology for older people and their dwellings. Additionally, it introduced health perception as a predictor of thermal preference – a variable often overseen by architectural sciences and building engineering. The study also provided insights on the use of deep learning for future studies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: health; machine learning; older people; personal comfort models; personalised comfort; thermal comfort
Index terms: thermal comfort, comfort, monitoring, South Australia, future study, modelling, deep learning, thermal preference, aggregate, older people, building engineering, methodology, machine learning, dataset, accuracy, science
Subjects: professional development, physical geography and landforms, research methods, environmental engineering, occupational health and safety management, data management, demography, materials science, specialized education, control systems, research design and methodology, mechanical systems, artificial intelligence, analytical methods
Topics: Sustainability, Health and Safety, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Education, Site Management, Digital Applications, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here