Kamari, A; Kotula, B M and Schultz, C P L (2022) A BIM-based LCA tool for sustainable building design during the early design stage. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 11(2), pp. 217-244. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: A robust method in environmental load assessment of buildings is urgently required to reduce the environmental burden of the construction industry. While the industry utilizes the life cycle assessment (LCA) method to assess environmental impacts of detailed designs, the implementation of changes at that late stage of development is often expensive and undesirable. On the other hand, during the early design stages, the LCA method is severely limited by the lack of information available, e.g., uncertainty about final materials to be used. This research study investigates how building information modeling (BIM) can facilitate LCA analysis at an early design stage. Design/methodology/approach: A literature review is conducted to establish a framework for BIM and LCA integration, which creates the foundation for the development of a new BIM-based LCA tool. The tool is empirically evaluated on a large case study of a residential building in Denmark. Findings: Case study results show that the new tool facilitates decision-making in an integrated design process, providing reliable LCA results on an early stage model, while avoiding intermediate manual input by the end user in contrast to other commercial LCA tools. Originality/value: A first prototype of a BIM-based tool is demonstrated, which allows professionals, small architectural companies, students and researchers to calculate the environmental loads of the building in the early design stage in an automated, transparent and time-saving manner.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; decision support tool; design decision-making; early design stage; life cycle assessment |
| Index terms: | construction industry, residential building, early design stage, integration, case study, literature review, decision support, integrated design process, methodology, end user, Denmark, decision-making, prototype, sustainable building design, implementation, life cycle assessment, design decision, building information modelling, environmental impact |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, information systems, data collection methods, modelling and simulation, design practice, Geography, decision analysis, research methods, industry analysis, construction type, data analysis and analytics, environmental impact, stakeholder, design process, energy systems, organizational analysis |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Construction Technology, Risk Management, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Design Practice, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here