Learning from the biology of evolution: Exaptation as a design strategy for future cities

Melis, A; Lara-Hernandez, J A and Melis, B (2022) Learning from the biology of evolution: Exaptation as a design strategy for future cities. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 11(2), pp. 205-216. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose: This paper highlights the importance of transdisciplinary studies in times of crisis. In the first part, the study shows the benefits of the introduction of literature on biology to better understand the evolutionary dynamics of architecture. Design/methodology/approach: The focus of the research concerns architectural exaptation. In biology, exaptation is a functional shift of a structure that already had a prior but different function. We will also learn that, in biology, all creative systems are redundant and involve variability and diversity. Findings: As a conclusion, through the comparison between biology and architecture, we will, therefore, try to build an architectural taxonomy that demonstrates how indeterminism is not a subcategory of design. Instead, design paradigms in which redundancy and variable diversity of structures reflect functionalism constitute an equivalent and essential complement with respect to design determinism. Originality/value: It demonstrates how architectural exaptation, intended as an indeterministic and radical mode of design, can contribute to overcoming the current global crisis because structural redundancy is frequently functional, mostly in ever-changing and unstable environments. For instance, the failure of a planned function of a city can be an opportunity to re-use a structure designed for an obsolete function to respond to unexpected constraints.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architecture; biology; design; exaptation
Index terms: paradigm, dynamics, taxonomy, variability, re-use, methodology, evolution, design strategy, redundancy
Subjects: data analysis and analytics, environmental science, design methods, statistical analysis, systems engineering, research methods, education and knowledge transfer, management, health safety and environment
Topics: Health and Safety, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Design Practice, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here