Purushothaman, M B and Kumar, S (2022) Environment, resources, and surroundings based dynamic project schedule model for the road construction industry in New Zealand. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 11(2), pp. 294-312. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide insights into the environment, resources and surroundings factors to develop a system dynamic model of dynamic project scheduling that aids on-time project delivery by reducing the project delay for the road construction industry in New Zealand (NZ). Design/methodology/approach: This study adopted narrative inquiry methodology that involved semi-structured interviews (SSI)/expert opinion and systematic literature review (SLR) data to determine the environment, resources and surroundings factors to develop a system dynamic model of dynamic project scheduling that aids on-time project delivery by reducing the project delay for the road construction industry in NZ. The data were analysed by using descriptive analysis, Likert scale and thematic analysis techniques to understand the relationship of these factors to propose a system dynamic model. Findings: This study concludes that weather, pandemic, material, geotechnical and disaster factors highly influence while other factors such as equipment shortage, breakdown, design error, labour and event had mixed impact on the dynamic scheduling (DS) that aids on-time project delivery. The proposed system dynamic model can enhance the understanding of factors affecting DS. Research limitations/implications: SLR is limited to English literature. The limitations of an SSI and a small sample size are acknowledged. Practical implications: The proposed model can reduce the uncertainty and scheduling errors during the planning phase and aid in the lesser scheduling modification during the execution phase. In practice, this study will be helpful for road contractors to understand environment, surroundings and resource in-control and out-of-control factors, overcome road construction delays, reduce cost, aid in stakeholder management and sustainable development. Social implications: The inclusion of environment, resource and surroundings factors in force majeure clauses will bring an understanding between contracting parties and in turn reduce disputes and delays and help social causes such as on-time infrastructure delivery. Originality/value: For the first time in a road construction, dynamic project scheduling model that collectively included and linked environment, resource, and surroundings factors to determine the in-control and out-of-control factors for an organisation is proposed. The novelty in the paper is provided by the inclusion of the events, disasters, and pandemics influence on DS in the NZ road construction industry for the first time.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; dynamic scheduling; project scheduling; road construction; scheduling |
| Index terms: | sample size, design error, force majeure, interview, sustainable development, project delivery, narrative, contracting party, weather, systematic literature review, road construction, project scheduling, scheduling, methodology, dispute, infrastructure delivery, Likert scale, stakeholder management, project delay, thematic analysis, New Zealand, pandemic |
| Subjects: | dispute resolution, mitigation, civil engineering, operations research, Geography, research evaluation and metrics, methods and analysis, health safety and environment, health risk and incident analysis, research methods, strategic project management, professional practice, research design and methodology, data collection methods, project delivery, qualitative and interpretive research, project controls, participation process, practitioner, air quality |
| Topics: | Time Control, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context, Procurement, Research Practice, Project Management, Health and Safety, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here